Stryker Hip Recall Litigation Update
The American Injury Attorney Group wants to keep consumers updated on the progress of Stryker hip recall litigation. Plaintiffs and their attorneys are filing lawsuits against Stryker, alleging that the manufacturer’s hip implants caused serious injuries. The devices in question, the Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck and hip stems, were recalled in July 2012 by the manufacturer after post-market data showed that the metal components in the devices were prone to corroding and fretting at the modular neck junction.
Prior to the recall, however, over 20,000 ABG II and Rejuvenate hip stems were sold worldwide. According to the recall, patients who had been fitted with these devices were at an increased risk for pain, swelling and adverse reactions in the nearby tissues, conditions which could potentially result in the need for revision surgeries.
Recent MDL Update News
It is important for those currently in the process of filing lawsuits and those considering filing claims to monitor developments in the current Stryker hip recall litigation. The multidistrict litigation, or MDL, is pending in the U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota. A multidistrict litigation consolidates pretrial proceedings for a number of plaintiffs and their attorneys; typically, the number of defendants is small in these cases.
However, unlike class action lawsuits, plaintiffs in a MDL have the opportunity to show individual cases and seek the appropriate compensation for their specific injuries. In a class action lawsuit, most plaintiffs are awarded the same amount, regardless of the damages in question.
In a MDL, the court often schedules and conducts bellwether trials to help both plaintiffs and defendants determine the value of their pending lawsuits; these trials are helpful in that they provide opportunities for both parties to decide whether it is in their best interests to go to trial themselves or to settle out of court.
According to a recent Stryker hip recall litigation update, there are currently 290 plaintiffs filing claims against Howmedica Osteonics Corp. over injuries allegedly caused by the company’s Stryker ABG II Modular-Neck Hip Stem and its Rejuvenate Modular Hip Stem. Because the MDL was established recently, the Stryker hip recall litigation is quickly growing. As of August 2013, only 198 cases existed in the MDL, indicating a 46.5 percent increase in one month as 92 plaintiffs joined the MDL since its last update.
Common Lawsuit Allegations
Among the claims of the plaintiffs whose cases are pending are that they have suffered from metallosis, necrosis, osteolysis or hip failure while fitted with the devices in question. Attorneys allege that other complications include:
- Loosening of the implant
- Premature implant failure
- Formation of pseudotumors
It is important to note that the statute of limitations in defective product and personal injury cases will vary depending on the state in which the injury took place. While many patients assume that a recall must happen prior to submitting a claim, such is not the case. Although the devices have been recalled across the globe, victims are seeking legal counsel from attorneys in an effort to obtain compensation for their injuries.
Stryker Hip Recall Litigation Attorneys Can Help You Today
Since it appears that more plaintiffs are filing lawsuits against Stryker and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. to seek compensation for their injuries, the Stryker hip recall litigation is expected to grow as more individuals file lawsuits against the manufacturer. If you or someone you love were fitted with a Stryker hip implant and you feel that you suffered injuries as a result, you may be entitled to file your own case and join the growing Stryker hip recall litigation. At the American Injury Attorney Group, we will help answer questions you may have and connect you with experienced attorneys who will assist you in filing a claim.